14 May Addressing the Lightweighting Problem: Is Giga Die Casting the Ultimate Answer?

by Bill Russo, Benjamin Fan and Lorenzo Song

The Path to the Future of Mobility

The automotive industry is undergoing one of the most significant transformations in its history. At the core of this evolution is the global pivot toward electrification, driven by the need to enhance energy efficiency and reduce environmental impact. Electric vehicles (EVs) have emerged as a cornerstone of this shift, offering cleaner alternatives to internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles. However, they also introduce new engineering challenges—chief among them is the demand for lightweight designs to extend driving range and reduce energy consumption.

Unlike traditional ICE vehicles, EVs rely on large, heavy battery packs. Every additional kilogram of weight translates into more energy consumption and diminished driving range. Therefore, lightweighting— reducing vehicle mass while maintaining structural integrity and safety—has become a defining characteristic of competitive EV design. From raw materials to manufacturing techniques, OEMs across the globe are racing to optimize vehicle weight.

China has rapidly positioned itself at the forefront of this shift. With strong government backing, a consumer base highly receptive to digital and smart mobility solutions, and the world’s most advanced EV ecosystem, China has become the super-scaler of the EV revolution. Government policies like the NEV Technology Roadmap 2.0 and the upcoming 3.0 version clearly articulate national goals in promoting energy-efficient, lightweight vehicles, making China a critical player in the global mobility race.

Electrification and the Importance of Lightweighting

Lightweighting is no longer a secondary consideration—it’s a central pillar of EV development strategy. As EV manufacturers look to optimize range without sacrificing performance or safety, they are forced to confront the weight dilemma head-on. Reducing the weight of the vehicle allows automakers to use smaller battery packs while maintaining range, reducing overall vehicle costs and carbon footprint.

Chinese policy guidance reflects this priority. The NEV Technology Roadmap 2.0 sets out lightweighting targets that call for the aggressive reduction of average vehicle weight and fuel consumption across the fleet. These initiatives aim not only to meet environmental goals but also to position Chinese automakers at the forefront of innovation. As Roadmap 3.0 is prepared for release, it is expected to place even more emphasis on the importance of smart manufacturing and advanced lightweighting technologies.

Tesla’s Response: Giga Die Casting

Among global OEMs, no company has done more to advance the cause of manufacturing efficiency and lightweighting than Tesla. At the heart of Tesla’s innovation is its pioneering use of Giga Die Casting (GDC) —a technology that is reshaping automotive body manufacturing. GDC involves injecting molten aluminum alloy into massive, high-pressure molds to produce large integrated components that traditionally would require dozens of smaller parts.

In Tesla’s Model Y, the rear underbody used to consist of around 70 separate components. Through GDC, this was reduced to just two castings. This transition brings massive advantages: fewer parts, less welding, simpler assembly, and crucially, weight savings. The results are tangible—lighter vehicles, longer range, and lower production costs. This technique is also being applied to Tesla’s futuristic Cybertruck and will likely become a cornerstone of their future vehicle platforms.

Tesla’s success with GDC has not gone unnoticed. In China, where Tesla launched its Shanghai Gigafactory in 2019, it has inspired a wave of domestic imitators and followers. Chinese companies are learning quickly—and in some cases, innovating further.

Xiaomi as a Fast Follower

A standout example of a fast follower is Xiaomi, a company better known for smartphones but now making a bold move into the EV sector. Inspired by Tesla’s success, Xiaomi has adopted GDC and partnered with Haitian Metal to co-develop casting machinery tailored for its own vehicle line. The company’s first EV, the SU7, utilizes GDC for key structural components including the rear underbody and the air conditioner mount.

In addition to production techniques, Xiaomi is investing in material science, having been granted a patent for a heat-resistant aluminum alloy tailored for GDC applications. This vertical integration of both machinery and materials underscores Xiaomi’s ambition to be more than just a follower—it wants to shape the future of smart EV production.

Advantages of Giga Die Casting

The appeal of GDC is easy to understand when one considers its benefits. At a high level, it offers:

• Part Consolidation: Reducing dozens of parts into one large casting simplifies design and assembly.
• Reduced Welding and Fastening: Fewer joints mean faster manufacturing and fewer potential failure points.
• Lower Vehicle Weight: Integrated aluminum castings reduce overall mass without compromising strength.
• Enhanced Production Efficiency: Fewer parts and simplified processes enable faster line speeds and lower labor intensity.
• Potential Cost Reductions: Over time, GDC can lower costs due to simplified logistics, inventory, and assembly.

These advantages are especially attractive in the EV segment, where lightweighting translates directly into range and efficiency gains. It’s no surprise that GDC has sparked such enthusiasm within the industry.

Disadvantages and Adoption Barriers

Despite its many benefits, GDC is not a silver bullet—and its widespread adoption faces several hurdles:

• High Capital Expenditure: Setting up GDC facilities requires substantial investment in machinery, tooling, and floor space.
• Process Complexity: Managing the thermal dynamics, shrinkage, and consistency of large aluminum castings requires deep technical know-how.
• Repair and Insurance Issues: In the event of collision damage, integrated castings often need full replacement, raising costs.
• Material Challenges: While some OEMs, such as Xiaomi, have developed proprietary alloys that do not require heat treatment, identifying and engineering suitable aluminum materials for large castings remains non-trivial.

• Joining Dissimilar Materials: As GDC parts often connect aluminum alloy structures with steel body components, new challenges arise in fastening and joining techniques, potentially increasing complexity in assembly and impacting manufacturability.
• Legacy System Incompatibility: Traditional automakers with sunk costs in stamping and welding face steep switching costs.

These limitations mean that GDC is best suited for high-volume players with the scale to absorb initial investments—such as Tesla or Xiaomi—especially those building from a clean sheet rather than trying to retrofit legacy factories.

Energy Saving and Lightweighting Strategy: The Alternatives

GDC is not the only answer to lightweighting. A comprehensive lightweighting strategy includes materials science, structural design optimization, and hybrid assembly methods.

• Aluminum: Already widely used, aluminum provides a balance between weight savings and manufacturability.
• Magnesium: Even lighter than aluminum, but it suffers from high cost and corrosion risk.
• Carbon Fiber Composites: These offer superb strength-to-weight ratios, but they are expensive and labor-intensive to produce. Moreover, carbon fiber materials exhibit anisotropic behavior—meaning they do not provide the same mechanical performance in all directions—making them less suitable for structural components that must endure multi-directional forces.
• Advanced Steels: New grades of high-strength steel provide enhanced safety and reduced weight while preserving cost efficiency.
• Composite Body Solutions (CBS): These involve polymer-fiber carriers bonded with structural adhesives. CBS provides high design flexibility, light weight, and structural rigidity, making it a compelling complement or alternative to metal-intensive solutions.

CBS, in particular, stands out for its flexibility. It allows automakers to pursue lightweighting without overhauling their existing manufacturing infrastructure. For companies not ready to invest in GDC, CBS may represent a more accessible path forward.

Conclusion: The Future is Lighter and Smarter

Lightweighting is no longer a choice—it is a necessity. As the automotive industry embraces electrification and digitalization, the pressure to reduce weight while increasing functionality grows stronger. Giga Die Casting represents a bold and innovative approach to this challenge, offering unprecedented efficiency gains. Yet it is not without trade-offs, and its suitability depends heavily on each automaker’s strategic context, scale, and technical capabilities.

Tesla’s success with GDC has demonstrated the potential of rethinking vehicle architecture from the ground up. Xiaomi’s rapid adaptation shows how new players can quickly close the innovation gap with the right investment and focus. Meanwhile, the broader ecosystem continues to develop complementary solutions such as CBS, which offer flexibility and incremental gains without the disruptive overhaul required by GDC.

Looking forward, the industry will likely witness a hybrid path. GDC will expand, especially among EV- native brands and high-volume producers. At the same time, legacy OEMs may adopt lightweighting through materials innovation, composite structures, and modular platforms. Continuous innovation in material science, digital twin manufacturing, and automation will further redefine what is possible.

The next phase of automotive development will not be dominated by a single answer—but by a constellation of technologies, working together to create vehicles that are not only electric and connected, but also lighter, safer, and smarter.

About the Authors

Bill Russo is the Founder and CEO of Automobility Limited, and is currently serving as the Chairman of the Automotive Committee at the American Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai. His over 40 years of experience includes 15 years as an automotive executive with Chrysler, including 21 years of experience in China and Asia. He has also worked nearly 12 years in the electronics and information technology industries with IBM and Harman. He has worked as an advisor and consultant for numerous multinational and local Chinese firms in the formulation and implementation of their global market and product strategies. Bill is a contributing author to the book Selling to China: Stories of Success, Failure, and Constant Change (2023), where he describes how China has become the most commercially innovative place to do business in the world’s auto industry – and why those hoping to compete globally must continue to be in the market.

Contact Bill by email at bill.russo@automobility.io

Benjamin Fan is a Senior Consultant at Automobility Limited. He has more than 8 years of experience in Market Research, Market Entry, Marketing & Branding Strategy and Organizational Development. He is passionate about the future of the automotive industry, and brings insights from both Consumer Goods and Healthcare industry to help shape the future of mobility with his clients.

Contact Benjamin by email at benjamin.fan@automobility.io

Lorenzo Song is a Consultant at Automobility Limited. He has several years of experience in the automotive industry as a consultant particularly focusing on the innovation and financing.

Contact Lorenzo by email at lorenzo.song@automobility.io

About Automobility

Automobility Limited is global Strategy & Investment Advisory firm based in Shanghai that is focused on helping its clients to Build and Profit from the Future of Mobility. We help our clients address and solve their toughest business and management issues that arise in midst of fast changing, complicated and ambiguous operating environment. We commit to helping our clients to not only “design” the solutions but also raise or deploy capital and assist in implementation, often together with our clients.

Contact us by email at info@automobility.io

PLEASE NOTE: The information and analysis shared in this article, including the charts and style of materials presented, is the intellectual property of Automobility Ltd. While we share it as a way to serve our existing and new clients, it is not to be used without our express consent and then only with attribution. Any publication, reproduction or other use of this material without the express written consent

of Automobility Ltd is prohibited.